It's the end of my third day of three weeks in Australia and I have done much else but watch Rugby Union. There's no much else on TV. If I go out into the street I see crowds of punters wearing a range of jerseys. If I browse the local news sites I see the same thing, but this time real players in .jpeg compressed format.
Yesterday night Australia defeated Agentina in what was a fairly close match, although the scoreline may not reflect this.
Today I've seen Italy get beaten by New Zealand, Ireland coming out victors over Romania, and France get one up on Fiji. Now I'm watching South Africa pretty much walk over Uruguay. The matches today have been watchable, but there seems to be [and imho always has in international rugby] two groups of teams - the really good, and the ok - which seems mainly due to the popularity of the game in the different countries.
Australia, New Zealand, England, South Africa, Wales, Italy, France and Ireland tend to have a much larger pool of players to choose from, and hence have more talent. Romania, Fiji, Uruguay, Canada, Japan, Georgia, Namibia, Tonga and the USA have only small numbers of players in their respective local leagues, and it really shows. In the case of Uruguay, they have only 1000 Rugby Union players in the country to choose a international team from.
Nobody's fault, but it makes for some pretty boring, one-sided-high-scoring, games. We'll probably have to wait until the next round before any of the more interesting matches occur.
Having said all that, all the teams have their good points and shine at moments, but....you know what I'm saying.
NOTE: I have no idea why I'm writing about Rugby Union...no idea.
btw: Check out my friend's Rugby site - Heaven's Game. He's a footy head [so he knows what he's talking about], and also a software developer I worked with. Great guy.